A Board packet is the set of materials prepared for a public meeting so commissioners and the public can review the items in advance. It typically includes the meeting agenda, prior meeting minutes for approval, consent agenda items, staff and department reports, bill lists or warrant registers, financial or budget updates, resolutions or ordinances, contracts or agreements, engineering or project memos, supporting exhibits, and any other background documents tied to action items or discussion topics. Depending on the meeting, it may also include legal memos, draft policies, maps, bid materials, presentations, proclamations, and attachments related to public projects or administrative matters. In short, it is the meeting’s working file and reference package.

The selection results of each individual commissioner for the volunteer vacancy positions were later made available through a Right-to-Know Request titled Volunteer Board Volunteer Rankings. 

The Board of Commissioners does have the authority to appoint individuals to volunteer positions and to choose the process used for those appointments. 

At the same time, the released records show that the rankings were completed outside of public view using a spreadsheet labeled "A–E" with no names on the spreadsheets.  

As a result, residents had questions about how the process aligned with prior discussions around increased transparency. During the meeting, there also appeared to be some uncertainty regarding how the selection method was being carried out. 

To view the files, please click here

Eric Fairchild told Richard Daniels that the Township had created several openings by not reappointing committee members whose terms expired on December 31, 2025. He also referred to openings previously mentioned by Judy Bailey, listed the available volunteer positions, and suggested that the Planning Commission could be a good fit for Daniels’ background.

Supporting records show that a Volunteer Appointment Memo identified three current vacancies on HARB, SAB, and Parks & Recreation. It also noted that Parks already had two candidates awaiting interviews, SAB had one qualified applicant, and HARB had no current applicants. A separate January 1, 2026 Township memo listed the expired board and commission terms, included attendance information, identified one upcoming vacancy, and asked the Board of Commissioners how it wanted to handle reappointments and advertising the openings.

To view the files, please click here. 

The released emails show that Bishop Road Bridge preservation was being actively explored in early 2026 through direct coordination with PHMC, Cumberland County, PennDOT, and township representatives. The correspondence reflects discussion of several alternatives to demolition, including rehabilitation, careful disassembly, storage, and possible transfer to a new owner, while agencies worked through the funding and legal questions tied to those options.   

A January 5 email from PHMC’s Tyra Guyton to Eric Fairchild outlined possible funding and review paths, including Keystone Historic Preservation grants, PennDOT-related programs, and the difference between state historic review and federal Section 106 review depending on what permits or funding were involved. Later emails show Eric Fairchild continuing to share bridge materials and preservation examples with PHMC, including historic images and Wrought Iron Bridge Works documents that PHMC said would be added to the bridge record.   

The strongest theme in the emails is funding eligibility. In mid-January, Eric Fairchild raised questions about whether county funding tied to demolition could instead support careful disassembly if the bridge were ultimately preserved for vehicular use. By late January, Cumberland County Planning Director Kirk Stoner formally asked PennDOT and other agency contacts for written guidance on whether county liquid fuels or $5 Local Use Fee money could be used for disassembly and storage, depending on the bridge’s final use. 

To view the files, please click here